Happy New Year!

On the one hand, on the other hand, yet, but & also

"HOW much our world of moving-image entertainment has changed in the past decade... And yet how little has changed in our world of movie-image entertainment.... Film is profoundly changing — or, if you believe some theorists and historians, is already dead — something that most moviegoers don’t know.... Should you care? I honestly don’t know, because I’m not sure what to think about this brave new image world... It is because the movies and our experience of them has changed so radically in recent years... that makes it difficult to grasp what is happening.... Google the words “death of cinema,” and you get more than 2.5 million hits... And yet we still watch movies. And if it looks like a duck (in widescreen) and quacks like a duck (in stereo), nothing has changed, right? It has and it hasn’t, as we will only understand as film continues to disappear" — Manohla Dargis, The New York Times

A free-form tone poem of pure gibberish. What is she talking about?

How to be a complete and utter Dick

"As I've watched the events of the last few days it is clear once again that President Obama is trying to pretend we are not at war. He seems to think if he has a low-key response to an attempt to blow up an airliner and kill hundreds of people, we won't be at war. He seems to think if he gives terrorists the rights of Americans, lets them lawyer up and reads them their Miranda rights, we won't be at war. He seems to think if we bring the mastermind of Sept. 11 to New York, give him a lawyer and trial in civilian court, we won't be at war. He seems to think if he closes Guantanamo and releases the hard-core Al Qaeda-trained terrorists still there, we won’t be at war, He seems to think if he gets rid of the words, ‘war on terror,’ we won’t be at war. But we are at war and when President Obama pretends we aren’t, it makes us less safe." — Dick Cheney, Politico

As I've watched the events of the last few days it is clear once again that Dick Cheney is trying to pretend that a scary phrase is scarier than an F 16 bomber with its rockets up your tail. He seems to think that if he has a hysterical response to a man who set light to his own underpants, we will think him one tough cookie. He seems to think that if he denies human rights to America's POWs, we won't mind when Americans get decapitated in response. He seems to think that if we bring the mastermind of Sept 11 to New York to receive the full measure of American justice, as Bush promised and failed to do, we will forget to blame him for ignoring the memo entitled "Bin Laden determined to strike inside the U.S." He seems to think if we close Guantanamo and release the innocent men we have tortured, their families will not thank us enough. He seems to think if he uses the words ‘war on terror,’ terrorists will lay down their arms and start baking cookies for us. But we are not at war with terrorism for the same reason that we are not at war with any abstract noun, and when Dick Cheney pretends we are, it makes us less safe.

Song of the day: 'Charlie Darwin' by The Low Anthem

The Low Anthem are a three-piece from Providence—folk musician and painter Ben Knox Miller, bassist and baseball scholar Jeff Prystowsky and classical composer and NASA technician Jocie Adams. Charlie Darwin was recorded “in the ghostly stillness of a Block Island winter” and inspired by a trip to the zoo. In an effort to get their song banned in the Bible Belt, they contacted teenagers in Kansas and gave them free mp3 downloads for them to take to school, but nobody bit.

REVIEW: It's Complicated

If only Nancy Myers were better at what she does. I've got nothing else against what she does. I regard it as the highest calling in movies. The world needs comedies like plants need sunlight. Our older actors are scandalously underused. There is real room for the films of someone like Myers, which is to say witty mature, urbane comedies about marriage and divorce — exactly the kind of thing Cary Grant and Claudette Colbert used to make in the thirties. I love the set-up for Its Complicated: woman has affair with her ex-husband. It's worthy of Leo McCary or Sturges. Filmmakers have long forgotten about the plots to be got from divorce. The rescucitation of the super-rich at the cinema, at least at this moment in our history, I'm not so sure about. It tells you a lot about America in the thirties, I think, that the vision of top-hatted suavity in a film like Holiday didn't feel exclusive or snobbishly insulated from the real world, but rather served up the dream that kept the real world ticking. This too, could be yours, Grant whispered to his Depression-era audiences and whether it was true or not didn't matter: it got them through another day. The first thirty minutes of It's Complicated, on the other hand — as Meryl Streep kisses goodbye to her perfect children before fussing over the million dollar-conversion plans for her sumptuous Bel Air estate — made me feel like converting to Marxism and water-bombing the nearest Martha Stewart store. This movie would have been twice as good if the incomes of the characters had been cut in half. The whole movie would have been better if it had been cut in half. Its swollen with way too many scenes in which Streep explores or explains her feelings — to her shrink, her children. Who cares? Streep is too good an actress for speeches. It's there in her eyes, her embarrassment undressing, her flicker of boredom while Baldwin complains about his current marriage. This, she recognises. This, she remembers. Readers of this blog will now how devoted it is to the cause of Baldwin — the actor, the man, his marital problems, his dignity, the loss thereof, the perfect blend of pathos and absurdity that now clings to him. It's Complicated is the first film role where all those elements have come simultanously into play. He propels himself through every scene with the ferocious energy of a wounded bull seal, bearing down on a stoned Streep and Steve Martin like Thor himself, eyes like slits, murder in his heart. He powers this movie into the realm of genuine comic delirium. Martin summons surprising amounts of sympathy for his role as the sensitive architect suitor, laying it straight for most of the movie, and loosing the lunacy only in the scene where he gets stoned. Streep warns him that it's really strong grass; Martin puts it to his lips and takes the biggest toke you've ever seen anyone take, bending over backwards in a perfect arc as he fills his lungs, further back and further back, before releasing a massive plume of smoke. It's an astonishing, rubbery reminder of the genie of physical comedy that we know inhabits that man's frame, waiting to get out — a bit like watching Picasso draw stick figures with crayons for 59 minutes and then in the 60th, someone finally thinks to give the guy a paint brush.

Best Songs of 2008: Viva la Vida by Coldplay

1. Viva La Vida — Coldplay

2. On A Day Like This — Elbow

3. Clowns — Goldfrapp

4. Lump Sum — Bon Iver

4. Falling Down (Chemical Brothers remix) — Oasis

5. New York — Cat Power

8. Smile — Janelle Monae

9. A Brand New Song — John Mellencamp

10. For Your Love — Marching Band

• Best Songs of 2009
• Best Songs of 2007
• Best Songs of 2006
• Best Songs of 2005
• Best Songs of 2004
• Best Songs of 2003
• Best Songs of 2002
• Best Songs of 2001
• Best Songs of 2000

Deconstructing the Dude

"In another of this book’s essays, “Professor Dude: An Inquiry Into the Appeal of His Dudeness for Contemporary College Students,” a bearded, longhaired and rather Dude-like associate professor of English at James Madison University in Harrisonburg, Va., named Richard Gaughran asks this question about his students: “What is it that they see in the Dude that they find so desirable?” One of Mr. Gaughran’s students came up with this summary: “He doesn’t stand for what everybody thinks he should stand for, but he has his values. He just does it. He lives in a very disjointed society, but he’s gonna take things as they come, he’s gonna care about his friends, he’s gonna go to somebody’s recital, and that’s it. That’s how you respond."

— Dwight Garner, reviewing “The Year’s Work in Lebowski Studies,” an essay collection edited by Edward P. Comentale and Aaron Jaffe (Indiana University Press, $24.95).

My Favorite Film Scores of the Decade 2000-2009

1. Birth (2004) — by Alexandre Desplat
The Nutcracker Suite as rewritten by Philip Glass, clicking into the slipstream of this film as elegantly as a cyclist. From the operatic swell of Nicole Kidman's love to the eerie tick-tock of her dawning realisation, this is a soundtrack beating out accompaniment to the human heart.

2. Catch Me If You Can (2002) — John Williams
Williams faced quite a challenge here: get with the foxy crystal-chandelier vibe of the film, but still find room to rouse and stir. His solution is an ingenious ice palace of a score — urgent and glittering, the sort of thing Prokofiev might have come up if asked to score a Bond film. Dog-sledding music. Mush!

3. Milk (2008) — Danny Elfmann
Like Elfman's score for Good Will Hunting this one nudges a tune around, cyclically, in round robin fashion, from instrument to instrument, until it seems to have loosed itself from the constraints of sequence altogether. It's like a mobile, just hanging there, catching the light as it turns.

4. Brokeback Mountain (2006) — Gustavo Santaolalla
A simple plucked guitar with symphonic backing: sometimes the oldies are oldies for a reason. If it worked for The Godfather, The Way We Were, the Deerhunter and Unforgiven, it can't be all bad. Santaolla's guitarwork is achingly sad and sweet, the kind of refrain that could underscore either love's fruition or frustration, depending.

5. The Royal Tenenbaums (2001) — Various
Wes Anderson has something of Scorsese's ability to use pop songs in a movie, slipping them under its skin so they weld to the images. This Nico song is no more and no less than the thing playing inside Margot Tenenbaum's head — a thought balloon, a valentine, private humming.

6. Up (2009) — Michael Giacchino
Up could be the title of all Pixar's films, of course, but here the uplift is literal: it's built into the vaulting intervals of Giachino's score, a sumptuous throwback to the Golden Age of Hollywood, when romance and adventure were two sides of the same coin, flipping through the air. Exactly the kind of music Carl and Elly first heard in movie theatres when they were young.

7. WALL-E (2008) — Thomas Newman
If you've ever wondered what music should accompany this sight of two robots dancing through space using fire extinguishers for propulsion, wonder no more. Newman's score is like a mixture of mathematics and skywriting — airy, sinuous, weaving, purposeful.

8. Marie Antionette (2007) — Various
There were a few things wrong with Coppola's movie but the decision to use a contemporary rock-pop soundtrack was a bold experiment that paid off. This Bow Wow Wow song, remixed by Kevin Shields and played as Marie Antoinette rides home from a party, is an example of what Roland Barthes would have called "jouissance" but which you and I know as "music to play with your head out the car window."

9. Moon (2009) — Clint Mansell
The best off-key note in a film since that bum piano note in Betty Blue. Creepy, hypnotic, dusted with melancholy and undeniably lunar. If you have to lose your mind to one piece of music this year, lose it to this.

10. Cold Mountain (2003) — Gabriel Yared
A score which surpassed its movie. Minghella's romance only really caught light in Yared's symphonic score, which starts as one of those Victorian piano pieces for polite gentlewomen and slowly unfurls to fill a whole landscape.

Please can we bomb Yemen? Please?

'In the wake of the latest failed terrorist attack on Northwest Airlines, one can smell the excitement in the air -- that all-too-familiar, giddy, bipartisan climate that emerges in American media discourse whenever there's a new country we get to learn about so that we can explain why we're morally and strategically justified in bombing it some more. "Yemen" is suddenly on every Serious Person's lips. We spent the last month centrally involved to some secret degree in waging air attacks on that country -- including some that resulted in numerous civilian deaths -- but everyone now knows that this isn't enough and it's time to Get Really Serious and Do More.' — Glenn Greenwald, Salon

Most experts agree that Al Qaeda's chances of defeating the United States range from zero to precisely zero. Their only hope lies in American over-reaction — if America can be coaxed into treating every failed terrorism attempt and crotch-bomber as if its very existence were at stake, then it will eventually exhaust itself. That is certainly the game that seems to be playing out, with each link in the chain not pausing to see where the chain is leading. Each congressmen wants only re-election. Desperate not to seem "weak" on terrorism, they repeatedly commit themselves to actions that feed the very problem they are trying to eradicate, which is to say: invading countries in the middle-east and killing muslims. As a strategy to combat terrorism emanating from the muslim middle-east, this course of action is self-evidently flawed, at least to anyone standing outside the continental Unites States.

The overwhelming consensus amongst counterterrorism scholars, experts and practitioners is that intelligence and law enforcement are the most effective tools available in terms of implementing effective counterterrorism policy, and, thus, these options should be relied on primarily. Not only does the military approach and attendant "war" rhetoric play to the advantage of transnational, stateless terror groups like al-Qaeda, but so too does that approach feed the overinflated, romantic sense of importance that is so appealing to potential recruits and members.

When I hear someone like Joe Lieberman suggesting we bomb Yemen some more, I hear someone preaching defeat. He might as well be saying "Let's give away American power now. Let's not wait until it is taken away from us. We're not losing it fast enough. Let's just give it away..."

What does Avatar do to the Oscar race?

Everything was fine until Avatar came along. Now, the chess board has been upended and all the pieces need rearranging. I agree with the Vulture that it can't get best film — at the end of the day it's a movie about blue people, and nobody gets two sweeps of the board, not even Spielberg. But remember what the Academy did in 1998 with Saving Private Ryan: they gave him director but not film. The only problem with giving Cameron best director is that it deprives Kathryn Bigelow of a hugely deserved and satisfyingly-historic win as the first woman director, but what if Hurt Locker got best picture? It wouldn't feel so bad then. Avatar has certainly doomed Precious's chance of winning by reminding the academy of what epic filmmaking can look and feel like. Their pallette for indie-small-worthy has been ruined. Can it do the same and knock Up In the Air off the board, leaving the way to Best Picture clear for The Hurt Locker? To put it another way: by proving themselves the other's only worthy opponents, do Cameron and Bigelow end up helping one another?

Song for the day: 'Brand New Song' by John Mellencamp

John Mellencamp's son, Speck, has set up a Facebook Page to convince his four-pack-a-day father to quit smoking. "I made a deal with my dad that if I get 1,000,000 to join this group he will quit smoking" he writes. Having conducted strenuous investigations into the supposed link between creativity and addiction and finding none, this blog heartily applauds such efforts and invites readers to join Speck.

The Princess Brides

'Highlights of the Kelly wardrobe are now on display in Rome. They include some of her most famous outfits, if you know the movies, yet without her inflection they are dead shells; in the Kelly universe, the soul needs the body as the body needs Edith Head, who dressed her for “Rear Window” and “To Catch a Thief.” They also demonstrate, beyond doubt, that nothing about Kelly was more stylish than her decision to quit the movies just in time, before the gods of fashion lost the plot—or, at any rate, the reliance on line and structure that had flattered and fortified her particular poise... If you want to see Hollywood at the last gasp of its otherworldliness, before the old glory gave way, consult the photograph of Kelly and her fellow-presenter, Audrey Hepburn, backstage at the Academy Awards in 1956. (Kelly had returned to present an award.) Both are in profile, gazing in expectation, and both wear white gloves. They could be at their first Communion.'

— Anthony Lane, reviewing “Gli Anni di Grace Kelly, Principessa di Monaco”, at the Fondazione Memmo in Rome, for The New Yorker

How can something that feels so right be wrong?

The London Review of Books is posting a Twitter feed of its personals. A selection of the best offers a fascinating insight into the British art of love:—

I bet a friend £18 I’d find a woman here and have sex with her. Reply and have sex with me, I’ll cut you in at 37%. English Professor, 63.

I’m placing an ad in this column. Things are worse than I thought. Not as bad as they are for you, F, reading this and about to reply. M, 34.

The celebrity I resemble the most is Potsie from Happy Days. What feels so right can’t be wrong. Man, 46. Box no. 2480.

F,45. Ready to begin again with M willing to provide time-sheets/supporting documentary evidence for every minute spent out of the house.

There’s enough lithium in my medicine cabinet to power three electric cars across a sizeable desert. Man, 33. Officially Three Cars Crazy.

Many people carry scars from past relationships. Not me: mine come from Chinese buffets. Clumsy, argumentative dim sum enthusiast (M, 45).

I grazed my knee writing this advert. Accident prone F, 35. Box no. 4311.

There are 289 species of octopus. I can, and will, name them all during the act of love. M, 58. Box no. 6759.

Via The Second Pass

The year of Obama: how's he doing so far?

As someone who campaigned for Obama last year, in the all important swing state of Ohio, I sometimes get asked what I think of the job he's doing. It's a difficult question to answer because I am never believed. People expect me to be more worried by this opinion poll, or annoyed by this quote, or concerned about this optic. Does he risk seeming professorial? Does he look a little too passive? Does he sound tough enough? They are asking me to comment on the appearance of things, in other words, which is the political question par excellence. How he is really doing, in terms of concrete effects, will obviously take a little longer to determine. Certain things, however, are evident. America has returned to the rule of law — an immensely reassuring development. It sets a good example to young children if the people in high office turn out not to be criminals. It also helps those office-holders' holiday plans if they can travel abroad without being arrested. Similarly, so far as I can tell Obama has not invaded any country under a mistaken or illusory set of beliefs. This is also important — not invading other countries by mistake. If millions are going to die it shouldn't be because the other guy was looking at you funny. Also, US military personnel have stopped torturing their prisoners — also good. Taking power drills to the heads of foreigners simply doesn't look good, no matter how adept you are at explaining it to their respective embassies. Ditto, threatening to crush the testicles of their children and sodomising their wives — a definite no no! The economy was stopped from imploding and a second great depression was narrowly avoided. Good. I like the movies made during the Great Depression — Sullivan's Travels is a particular favorite — but the diet wasn't everything it could have been, I hear. Something was done to correct the healthcare system so you don't go bankrupt when you catch a cold. Good, also. Buying a plane ticket to England every time I got sick wasn't going to be workable in the long term. What else. America is no longer the byword for international lawlessness, acts of sodomy in all the major theatres of war are way down, no major countries invaded by accident, economic catastrophe averted, the biggest single piece of social legislation in 40 years, a restructured US car industry, the appointment of a Latina Supreme Court justice... no I guess that's it. It could be better, I guess, but Rome wasn't built in a day.

America's blitz spirit

Over at the Daily Beast, Tunku Varadarajan takes exactly the wrong message from the recent attempted terrorist attack. He notes

"the swiftness with which our popular culture has made light of the episode. “Fruit of the Loon,” blared the front page of the New York Daily News, in a play on the name of an underwear brand... People are asking when the last time it was that a Dutchman tackled a Nigerian outside a soccer field, and making quips about an Islamist “boxer rebellion,” a terrorist “brotherhood of the traveling pants,” a “jock-strap jihad,” and a “new Y-front in the war on terror.”

Excellent news, surely: evidence not just of the nation's sense of humor but of precisely the spirit that got Britain through the Blitz and which saw off the threat of terrorism — by refusing to be terrified. All wrong, says Varadarajan. Such larkiness offers "telling commentary on our state of mind—a commentary, in truth, on the extent to which we have become inured to threats of terrorism." Fair enough, I guess, if a little grumpy. We mustn't rest on our laurels. We are a nation at war after all. Maybe we should be asked to sacrifice more than just a few minutes waiting time at the airport. But no. The security measures, too, are at fault:—

Instead of denying my 10-year-old boy the right to take a pee when his destination is a whole hour away, why can’t we be radically more careful about those we let on board our planes? Abdulmutallab’s name was not on the terrorist “no-fly” list, which has fewer than 4,000 names in total. It was, however, on a larger database of some 550,000 individuals, called TIDE (Terrorist Identities Datamart Environment)—and it was inserted there, it seems, only last month. Why is anyone on this list allowed to board a plane to the United States? Why not convert TIDE into a “no-fly” list?"

What he is advocating is a system wherein Abdulmutallab’s father could have barred his own son from ever flying, purely on his say-so: effective for the 1% of genuine terrorists it catches, not so much for the 99% of people using it to settle family arguments or conduct grudge matches with their neighbours.

Let anyone on that list who believes his name is there erroneously, or undeservedly, appeal—through legal channels—for removal. If he has a case, it will surely be heard, and yield a just, airborne outcome.

Ah. How well that would work. Now he's the one joking, surely.

Song of the day: 'Woke Up This Morning' by Roman Candle

From Oh Tall Tree In the Ear by North Carolina band Roman Candle, made up of husband and wife Skip and Timshel Matheny, as well as Skip’s brother Logan. Skip and Timshel also have two kids who go on tour with them 95% of the time.

"Some bands deal with heroin or coke habits while they’re playing shows and that’s it’s own obstacle. We have children, which is very different than a heroin habit."

REVIEW: The Hangover

We finally caught up with The Hangover on pay-per-view last night. It's one of those movies that somehow managed to slip through the cracks due to a profoundly offputting trailer: a whole bunch of unfamiliar fratboys getting into japes in Vegas with hookers and tigers and something to do with a missing tooth. It looked like the guy who loses the tooth loses it early in the movie, too, so you have to stare at the gap for the whole movie. Ever since Jeff Goldblum lost his hand in the The Fly, I've had a thing about heroes suffering irreversible physical impairments in the course of a film. It doesn't sit well with me. As it turns out, Ed Helms is the best thing in the movie. I still found it a little absent the charms of the fairer sex, although Heather Graham pops up, delightfully, with those Disneyish eyes of hers; some of the gags had a Three-Stooges heartlessness to them; and the lead hunk preens in a way that only compounds the mortal sin of making Sandra Bullock chase after him in All About Steve earlier in the year — who is this sun-kissed doofus, anyway? Preen away, hot stuff, it won't last long. But I was buoyed along by the plot, weirdly, and the conceit was ingenious, as our errant bachelors reconstruct one drunken night in the cold light of day. Its a reaction shot contest, basically, and Helms wins hands down, with his stricken elongated features, the most stricken and elongated since Hugh Laurie quit comedy, and made for confronting chickens.

Quote of the day: Sarah Palin

'Though Nancy Pelosi and friends have tried to call “death panels” the “lie of the year,” this type of rationing – what the CBO calls “reduc[ed] access to care” and “diminish[ed] quality of care” – is precisely what I meant when I used that metaphor.' — Sarah Palin

Except it's not a metaphor either. 'All the world's a stage' is a metaphor because a stage is something you can point to, whose attributes can therefore be borrowed. 'All the world's a death panel' cannot be because death panels do not in actuality exist. The word she is groping for, but is understandably reluctant to use, is, I believe, "imaginary." Keep wowing 'em, sister.

What do you mean 'what do I mean'?

Compiling a top ten European films of the decade is a tricky business—what do we mean by "European", by "film", or even by "decade"?' — The Auteurs

That level of scepticism surely creates problems for more than just the writing of a 'best of decade' list. "Getting" up in the "morning" would also be pretty hard to interpret. As would "going" to "bed" at "night." Having "lunch", "going" to the "john" and "taking" a "dump" could also prove highly problematic, for what do any of these things mean?

Best Albums of 2008

1. For Emma, Forever — Bon Iver
2. The Trails of Occupanther — Midlake
3. In Ghost Colours — Cut Copy
4. Bring Me Your Love – City and Colour
5. Shine — Estelle
6. Seventh Tree — Goldfrapp
7. The Seldom Seen Kid — Elbow
8. Dig Out Your Soul – Oasis
9. Spark Large — Marching Band
10. Freddie and the Trojan Horse — The Radio Dept.

Best Songs of 2008

1. One Day Like This — Elbow
2. Magic — University of Chicago Voice in My Head
3. I Remember - Dedmau5 & Kaskade
4. Blindsided — Bon Iver
5. Cape Cod Kwassa Kwassa — Vampire Weekend
6. D.A.N.C.E — Justice
7. The Shock of the Lightning — Oasis
8. Great DJ — The Ting Tings
9. Can't Take It In — Imogen Heap
10. Furr – Blitzen Trapper

Happy Christmas everybody

Best films of 2008: The Wrestler

1. The Wrestler
2. The Diving Bell and the Butterfly
3. Iron Man
4. Milk
5. WALL-E
6. The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
7. Shine a Light
8. Defiance
9. Man on Wire
10. Frozen River

The year in review: the spirit of adventure

Christmas is fast approaching, the spirit of forgiveness is loosing the cobwebs around my heart, and my thoughts turns to those I have unjustly maligned or judged too harshly over the course of the year. Was I really justified in saying A Serious Man was the Coen's most joyless movie? Was Up In the Air that much of a disappointment? Was the direction of Precious really that mediocre? Well, yes. I can only call it as I see it. I cannae lie to yae. But movies mean different things to people at different times in their life. This year I was in no mood to have my spirits lowered. I put an especially high premium on delight. I was not in the market for the fingering of wounds, the simmering of resentments, or the hyena-like cackle of the merely clever. That's why Bright Star meant so much to me, and An Education, and Avatar, and Up, all movies bouyed by adventurous spirits, or about adventurous spirits, and delivering the best kind of lift, the kind that once inspired Spielberg to shoot the back wheels of the boy's bikes in E.T. all landing within an inch of one another — one, two, three — or which prompted Bill Murray to light that cigarette after applying the Heimleich maneuvre in Groundhog Day. If I was going to take an unblinking look at the world's most trouble spots, I wanted it done by a movie as brisk and unlingering as the Hurt Locker. If I wanted a film about someone falling apart in solitude, I wanted it as beautiful and melancholy as Moon. If I had to be taken to the end of the world, I wanted to do so with a film as strong-hearted as The Road. Just as pure fantasy dissolves like candyfloss, so does the merely grim fail to satisfy (Precious was a mixture of just those two extremes, with nothing in between). It's a dichotomy that runs right through American movies, with blockbusters and indies, fantasists and realists, optimists and pessimists, lined up against one another, and never the twain shall meet. I liked the pictures where they met. Were I a member of the Academy my ballot would read as follows:

Best Picture: Avatar
Best Director: Kathryn Bigelow
Best Actor: Viggo Mortensen
Best Actress: Carey Mulligan
Best Supporting Actor: Stanley Tucci (J&J)
Best Supporting Actress: Vera Farmiga
Best Score: Michael Giacchino (Up)
Best Animated Film: Up
Best Documentary: Anvil! The Story of Anvil!
Best Adapted Screenplay: Nick Hornby
Best Original Screenplay: Mark Boal (HL)
Best Cinematography: Greig Fraser (BS)
Best Costumes: Janet Patterson (BS)
Best Editing: Bob Murawski (HL)
Original Song: Ryan Bingham & T Bone Burnett (CH)
Best Sound Editing: Alan Rankin (Star Trek)
Best Sound Effects: Ken Fischer (Avatar)

Ripley Redux: Alien's 30th anniversary

“Alien is to Star Wars what the Rolling Stones were to the Beatles,” said producer David Giler, “Its a nasty Star Wars.” Produced by the same studio, Fox, still under the management of Alan Ladd, the Alien script had been sitting on the desk as Fox for almost a year without so much as a flutter of interest, according to screenwriter Dan O’ Bannon: “They wanted to follow through on Star Wars, and they wanted to follow through fast and the only spaceship script they had sitting on their desk was Alien, so they greenlighted it, wham.” It almost certainly couldn’t have been the quality of O’Bannon’s script. A hardcore sci-fi nut and neophyte screenwriter, fresh from USC, O’ Bannon had written something called Starbeast, and it came crammed with clichés from sci-fi movies of the fifties like Forbidden Planet and It! Terror From Beyond Space. There were pyramids, and holograms, and an all-male cast, who spoke at length about “what should be done” in stiff, officer-class locutions, but never got around to doing very much:

STANDARD steps forward and slaps ROBY across the face.
The others are shocked.
HUNTER: Hey now, what is this?
STANDARD: Ask him.
ROBY: I understood why you did that.
STANDARD: Good...
After a hard stare at Roby, Standard give him a curt nod and turns
his attention to the machinery.

It read like The Last Days of the British Raj — all curt nods, hard stares and stiff upper lips in space. “It had not even B-picture merit,” said producer Walter Hill. “Nobody could take it seriously. It had a ‘Jesus gadzooks’ quality about it”. Hill had just set up a production company, Brandywine films, with his partner David Giler, and landed a production deal at Fox, when a friend passed them O Bannon’s script, and while they both hated it, they admired what Hill called the “low cunning” of its set-up — “you had a monster that could not be killed without destroying your own life-support system”. Giler sensed that the key to the film would be to treat it like an A-movie, with full production values, and so he and Hill sat down and rewrote the script, in just under three days. Hill was the writer / director behind such films as The Warriors and The Driver, and he wrote scenes that played out like a one-liner competition at a tough-guy convention. “Character is action,” he once said. “In my films, when somebody puts a gun in your face, character is how many times you blink.” He dropped the pyramids, introduced a computer called mother, made two of the characters women, introduced a note of discord between the officers and the working class crew, and streamlined the whole thing with his headlong, hard-boiled style — somewhere between “staccato and blank verse”, said Giler, and it went something like this:

A red stain.
Then a smear of blood blossoms on his chest.
The fabric of his tunic is ripped open.
A small head the size of a man’s fist pushes out.
The tiny head lunges forward, comes spurting out
of Dallas’s chest trailing a thick body.
Spatters fluids and blood in its wake.
Lands in the middle of the dishes and food.
Wriggles away while the crew scatters.

Halloween Haiku. It is to Hill, then, that we owe much of Alien — its rhino-charged momentum, its oil-besmirched air of class war, the character and sex of Ripley — and it was his script that hooked Scott. It took him forty minutes to read: “It usually takes about four days. It was just Bang! Whoompf! Straight through. It was unpretentious, very violent, yet a lot of character painting came through, and I just thought it was an amazing piece of entertainment. Also to me it was more than just a horror film, its a film about terror.” He sensed that it would play even faster than it read. The rough cut of the film was ready 8 days after shooting wrapped, and ran to 3 hours and 12 minutes. Ladd remembers it as “the most tense movie I’ve ever seen in my entire life. My wife and I went for lunch afterwards and some of the people who were there weren’t able to eat.” Scott admits he took it too far; he’d been watching Tobe Hooper’s The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, and was aiming for the same bone-at-breaking-point tone. “Our rough cut was just too intense. Originally, there was a stronger degree of terror. Just subtle things, half seen, half heard things earlier in the picture. Consequently you have the audience holding on from the beginning. That’s no good.” He and editor Terry Rawlings went back and let a little more air into the movie, a bit more in the way of breathing space. “The whole thing was an exercise in seeing how far back you could cock the pistol before you had to release the trigger,” says Rawlings, “It was finding that moment. How long can you wait? How long can you go along those air shafts before it all gets too much for the audience. Now, of course, things are frantic from the word go but with Alien it was a waiting game.”

How long was the wait? How long has the Nostromo been drifting through space before its crew are woken up? We never find out. All we know is how long what wakes them up to then polish them off: just over 40 minutes. As for how long they have been travelling, we hear only that they are still several ten years away from earth — a quietly devastating figure — and we hear them bickering with one another “Quite griping,” snaps Kane (John Hurt). “I like griping” snaps back Lambert (Veronica Cartwright). That long. To anyone fresh from the bright-eyed camaraderie of Star Wars, the fug of fatigue and cigarette smoke that hung over the cramped cabins of the Nostromo was a revelation: not just griping in space, but smoking. And after they’d gone to all the trouble of taking all that oxygen up there, too. We’d never seen anything like it. Nobody ever lit up during 2001: A Space Odyssey, despite its tedium, and you never got any bickering over pay in Star Wars, but then, for all the reach of Lucas’s empire, you never got to see any real work. As Kevin Smith pointed out in his 1997 comedy, Clerks, the death star appears to have built itself. “A construction job of that magnitude would require a helluva lot more manpower than the Imperial army had to offer. I'll bet there were independent contractors working on that thing: plumbers, aluminium siders, roofers...”

In Alien you got to see the work. You got to see the empire’s plumbers, siders and roofers, its engineers and worker ants, all mortgaging off years of their life to trawl the inky backwaters of space, in a ship that was just that: a dank and rattling freighter, named the Nostromo, after another Conrad novel, and not just any Conrad novel but his “masterpiece” i.e. his least read. This was serious. Generally speaking, blockbuster films until then weren’t in the habit of name-dropping great unread books — Jaws got by perfectly well without invoking Moby Dick, or Star Wars without quoting Joseph Campbell, although if you really want to know how grown-up the whole thing felt, here was the killer: we couldn’t even see the bloody thing. Released with an 18-certificate in the US and an X in the UK, Alien was one last wave from Hollywood’s pre-teen-market era, although at the time it felt horribly unjust: adults had stolen our blockbuster. What was rightfuly ours — it had spaceships and aliens, and everything — was being held against its will, until it came out on video, and we could persuade our local video store clerk to turn a blind eye. It didn’t stop us, of course. Thanks to a number of spin-off books released that summer, including a complete shot-by-shot set of storyboards, I was, by the time I got to see the film, immaculately prepped for everything the film had to throw at me — all the stomach-bursts and face-grabs, body snatches, head-smashes and skull crushes. Everything except the sex. That, the storyboards hadn’t prepared me for.

So that was why they’d kept this film under wraps. Star Wars had pretty much been a pre-pubescant’s paradise, with Lucas taping down Carrie Fisher’s bosom with gaffer tape, in case his audience got ideas; “no breasts bounce in space, there’s no jiggling in the Empire” remarked Fisher, with characteristic waspishness. But sex was everywhere in Alien, from its gynaecological corridors and vulvic doorways to its crabby, post-coital atmosphere — everywhere, that is, except where you might normally expect to have found it, which is to say, between the characters. Originally, there was to have been a scene showing Ripley sharing a cuddle with her captain, but as Scott realised, it came just after the alien had gotten onboard, slowing down the action, and besides, by that time the film had already notched up its big sex scene, involving something wet, and slimy, with its eye on John Hurt. The exact implications of what happens to Hurt have engendered more fevered analysis than any single scene in any blockbuster, even more than the Tony Curtis-Lawrence Olivier bath scene in Spartacus. What happens next is that Hurt gives birth to the alien, or “chest-burster” as it was affectionately called by Scott and his crew, although in truth, the alien doesn’t burst through Hurt’s chest, so much as gently push through, like a puppy nuzzling through wet tissue, and then bolts, sending the cutlery flying, and launching more graduate theses than a month of Jean Baudrillard lectures. A “particularly horrifying confusion of the sexual-gyneacological with the gastro-intestinal” decided James Kavenagh, in his seminal essay ‘Son Of A Bitch: Feminism Humanism and Science in Alien’ (October no 13, 1980) for Science Fiction Studios, which devoted an entire symposium to Scott’s film.

The shock waves of blockbuster movies were now travelling further afield than just Wall street; they were reaching the leafy groves of academe, which would soon be spilling over with essays with vaguely terrifying titles like “Being Keanu” and “Totally Recalling Arnold: Sex and Violence in the New Bad Future.” Alien was, though, the first — the newest, baddest future on the block, and siring a small cottage industry of academic analysis devoted to its subtextual nooks and semiological crannies. Feminists warmed to the fact that all the white males become dead white males at a faster rate than the non-white males. Marxists nodded approval of the film’s grimy, Conradian take on late-capitalism. And Freudians, needless to say, had a field day, for a film more in need of a trip to the analyst would be harder to find. Even Jones the cat received his own diagram:—

As Kavenagh explained: “The founding term in the film is human (S), represented by the image of Ripley as the strong woman. The anti-human (-S), is, of course, the Alien, and the not human (S) is Ash, the robot. The cat, then functions in the slot of the not anti-human (-S), and indispensable role in this drama.” The world of alien studies was not all neatly drawn diagrams and smoothly-processed deconstructions, however, and was soon to be ripped asunder by a bitter and acrimonious debate, one pitting sister against sister, brother against brother, comrade against comrade. It is with due caution and some trepidation that we therefore approach the singular, divisive issue of Lieutenant Ellen Ripley’s knickers.

For some, the sight of Ripley stripped to her undies at the end of the film, as she prepares to do final battle with the alien, undid all the film’s good work. Judith Newton found the third-act survival of the two woman and one black character “especially promising”; but bikinis, she noted sternly are “not standard gear for space duty.... Ripley, though in many ways a fine and thrilling hero, is robbed of radical thrust.” To the rescue came Kavenagh, who in ‘Feminism and Anxiety In Alien’ (Science Fiction Studies, vol 7, no 3, 1980) wrote: “I would disagree with an ideological denunciation of the film as simply another exercise in conventional sexism on the basis of the scene in which Ripley removes her uniform to appear in T-shirt and panties. Such criticism would be hard-pressed to avoid repressive and self-defeating assumptions about what constitutes sexism, and irrelevant assumption about what constitutes the film and its ideological discourse.” A cunning move — the panties weren’t sexist; the accusation that the panties were sexist was sexist — but maybe a trifle over-defensive? It was left to Barbara Creed to arbitrate, with an air of weary summary: “Much has been written about the final scene, in which Ripley undresses before the camera, on the grounds that its voyeurism undermines her role as successful heroine....” She proposed a diplomatic solution, designed to unite both pro-panties and anti-panties camps: What if the panties “signify an acceptable and in this context reassuring fetish object of the normal woman?” Then, “the final sequence works, not only to dispose of the alien, but also to repress the nightmare image of the monstrous-feminine with the text of patriarchal discourses.” Voila. Easy when you know how.

Fun as it always is to see academics getting their knickers in a twist, it is perhaps too easy to laugh at this stuff: Popular film has always attracted a certain amount of academic attention, the dominant model being those tweedy articles in the fifties examining the Godzilla and UFO invasion movies for signs of nuclear-age anxiety, or Cold War nerves. It is a model buttressed by a clear sense of intellectual superiority — the academic plumbs the innocent pop-culture artefact for meanings it didn’t even know it had — but it doesn’t get you very far with the modern blockbuster, since it fails to countenance the possibility that the meaning might be there because someone — the filmmakers — put it there. This rather alarming possibility would continue to flummox blockbuster exegeticists — in 2003, one Matrix fan asked the Wachowski’s whether the religious subtext of their trilogy was “intentional”, as if a skein of religious references were something that just happened to a movie by accident, on its way to the theatre — and the same goes for much of the analysis that enveloped Alien. On the one hand there is nothing very academic about a film in which an alien repeatedly plunges its jaw into the cerebrum of its victims — ”it has absolutely no message,” insisted Scott, it works on a very visceral level and its only point is terror, and more terror” — but there is no denying that Alien is a studious film, so full of details that cry out for parsinh — the dipping bird, the Hawaiian shirts, the Farrah-era pin-ups — that you wish Scott would slow down a little to let you pore over it. On the other hand, look where that gets science officer Ash (Ian Holm), hunched over his microscope like an art restorer sizing up varnish strengths. When it comes to the burgeoning field of post-doctorate Alien study, Ash graduates with full honours, summa cum lauda. Study is all he wants to do, eyeing up the alien for its possibilities in the company’s weapons division. “Its a perfect organism, its structural perfection matched only by its hostility” he says. “You admire it,” says an incredulous Ripley. “I admire its purity,” replies Ash, “a survivor, unclouded by notions of remorse, morality. You have my.... sympathies”.

The real question, of course, is not whether they had Ash’s sympathies, but whether they had their director’s. “I found it very pure,” said Scott of the script’s clean lines, echoing Ash’s rather creepy wording. Did Weaver detect something of Ash’s slightly inhuman connoisseurship in Scott’s continual fussing over his ship’s design and decor? At times, certainly, Alien seems to have been directed by an intelligence you would hesitate to call human. Look at the clinical, Kubrickian tracking shots of the empty spaceship at the start — Scott seems to prefer it that way, all neat and unmessed — or the shot of Jones the cat which punctuates Harry Dean Stanton’s death: irises narrowing coolly, while the poor human fights for its life. Scott clearly has a thing for irises, for we would see that look again in the basilisk gaze of his replicants in Blade Runner, a movie too becalmed by its own beauty to be bothered with moving its plot along. Alien, too, is a beautiful film, most obviously when it alights on the alien planet, with its Piranesian vistas, but once the film down-shifts into the Nostromo’s airshafts, it moves too fast to admire itself, with Scott keeping shots of his creature down to a bare minimum — a glimpse of plunging jaw, or shining skull, and that is it. Then there is Weaver, in whom the movie’s lack of vanity comes, quite literally, to a head: bony and beautiful, hair pinned back to reveal that fascinatingly multi-planed face. Did Scott realise the subtle visual rhyme he had established between his heroine and her antagonist? The third film would nail it — having Ripley shave her hair, and then bring her quite literally head to head with the alien, one skull against another — but back in 1979, there was very little else to hint at Ripley's eventual survival, for like Star Wars and Jaws before it, Alien benefited enormously from the non-starriness of its casting, setting its crew out before us with a poker face, to let us guess who would come up trumps.

That there would be sequels was never in any doubt. Wasn’t replication what the movie was about? When Ash praised the alien for being a “perfect organism, its structural perfection matched only by its hostility” it sparked off an echo of Richard Dreyfuss’s speech in Jaws about the shark being “a perfect engine” and all it wanting to do being “swim, eat and make little shark”, which in turn triggered a complex set of synapses in the audience’s brain which said, essentially “He’s Coming Back For Seconds,” and caused them to cancel all social engagements the following summer. Whereas the shark of the Jaws sequels was, as the years went by, forced to snack on a diet of ever-more indistinguishable teens, the Alien films had two reasons to continue — its beauty and its beast. The curious thing was that it took 7 summers, with the release of Aliens in 1986, for anyone to get around to realising this. These days, a movie like XXX is barely past its opening weekend, before Sony takes out full-page ads in variety congratulating itself on the birth of a new superhero franchise. So what happened with Alien?

Despite breaking Star Wars opening-week records, taking $8.5 million, it slowed down quickly, eventually taking $40.3 million — enough to make it the number five hit film of that year, but not enough to lift the movie out of the red. Partly this was down to old-fashioned Hollywood accounting, but also because Fox had spent so much on advertising. The ads for Alien were devised by Stephen Frankfurt, the advertising maven who had marketed Rosemary’s Baby with a ground-breaking trailer, featuring a slowly-advancing shot of a pram, and the words, “Pray for Rosemary's baby” — the progenitor, in other words, of the sort of soft-drop pay-off line that would come to play so well off the blockbuster, in the years to come. For Alien, Frankfurt came up with the line “in space no-one can hear you scream” and a stunning series of trailers — elliptical, and quick as a lizard — but Fox spent $16 million, all told, on marketing the movie, and by the end of the year, were still showing a net loss of $2.4 million, prompting a legal wrangle over the disbursement of profits that would, together with a series of management changes at Fox, keep any thoughts of a sequel safely buried for the next seven years. Ripley could sleep a little longer.

— reprinted from my book Blockbuster: How Hollywood Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Summer (2004)

Avatar: critics reax

"Avatar fails in one rather important respect. By common consent, its story's rubbish. James Cameron seems to have lifted Avatar's story from the movie-maker's trashcan... The film is mere spectacle, about as emotionally engaging as the associated videogame. Certainly, thinking like this seems pretty pervasive in Hollywood. In 2009, films such as Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen, Terminator Salvation and Fast & Furious have all seemed to reflect the assumption that emotional interaction is dispensable. Of course, movies like these do well at the box office, and so will Avatar." — David Cox, The Guardian

There are two arguments here, each contradicting one another: 1) Avatar's story is rubbish, and 2) Avatar's story is non-existent. People use "story" to mean all sorts of things, of course — "I didn't like the story" can turn out to mean everything from plot to mood. I suspect that what Cox means to fault is not that the narrative, which felt solid to me, but the dialogue, which contains a succession of howlers, as is always the case with Cameron, whose movies are like Vegas mansions: strong construction, lousy interior decoration. He may, in fact, have the worst taste of any working director. But the proportion of care taken over the story in Avatar compared to that taken in Transformers or Terminator: Salvation is approximately a 1000 to one. Cameron's narrative instincts are deep and unfakeable, such that they render the inadequacies of his scriptwriting largely moot: he tells the story with his camera, as does every great director from Griffith to Lynch.

The New Yorker's Richard Brody writes:—

The experience was surely exciting, and inspired, as Manohla Dargis says in the Times, “awe” (though not shock). What it didn’t engender was joy—the near-laughter at visual inventions that are so extravagant as to seem borderline ridiculous and that, at the same time, actually pack a new idea.

Brody is fast turning into the 'Time Out' of film writers*: the guy whose opinions I can safely invert to get something close to my own reaction. It's very helpful. What he describes is exactly the reaction I did have. I felt myself close to laughter for much of the movie — the laughter born of pure flabberghast, like the delighted gurgling of a child. Critical reaction to the movie can be divided into two camps: those who have felt this and those who have not. If you have, you'll forgive the film anything and if you have not, well, there's always the theatre.

* I mean the London Time Out, not the New York one.

Appearing in the photographs of strangers

'Jessie Catherine Fuller and Peyton Brodnax DeWitt Rodgers were married Saturday at the Players in Manhattan... The bridegroom, 28, is known as Buck. He is a production assistant on the film “The Other Guys,” with Will Ferrell (who made a cameo appearance in the couple’s photo) and Mark Wahlberg, which is shooting in New York.' — New York Times

Will Ferrell's cameo in a wedding announcement in the New York Times made me laugh. It also sparked a pet thought of mine, which is: how many photo albums am I in accidentally? I was photographed in the background of a Japanese family's tourist shot of 5th avenue just the other day. I must have walked into view of dozens, maybe hundreds, of photographs in the course of my life, which if reconstructed, Zelig-fashion, would amount to a flickering, faltering record of my life. That skinny chap on the beach. That passing blur in the street. That guy pointing at the pigeon poop on the Eiffel Tower. Right now, as I write this, a couple is cooing over they honeymoon pictures, pausing only to puzzle over the man in the corduroy jacket, beetling past. "Who's that?" That's me!

My Top Ten Songs of the Decade

1. Wake Up, by The Arcade Fire

2. Poses, by Rufus Wainwright

3. Digital Love, by Daft Punk

4. Simple (2002), by k d lang

5. One Day Like This, by Elbow

6. 1901, by Phoenix

7. Hide and Seek by Imogen Heap

8. Blindsided, by Bon Iver

9. Sweet Disposition, by The Temper Trap

10. Clocks by Coldplay

Honorable mentions here.

I am nothing if not a windsock caught in the hot thermals of popular musical taste. It's very rare that I find myself muttering "I can't believe they're not better known." I rarely curse the fickleness of the multitude. The qualities that make something successful are also qualities I happen to like. If there is an album of cool, angular and faintly unlikeable indie music, with one song on it that is destined to end up in a movie, I will pick out that one that ends up in the movie, every time. I am most definitely not a child of punk. My cousin Dave used to sing me that Undertones song, My Perfect Cousin, the one about the kid of does his homework and listens to the Human League and wears a sheepskin jacket. That was me. I didn't listen to a band who used guitars until I was 15. The first live concert ever went to was Kraftwerk. I know how to program a Roland TR 808 and can call out a Linn Drum at 200 paces. It was a huge relief to me when synthesisers became cool again. I once had a Carpenters phase. I prefer McCartney to Lennon. I bought Stop by the Spice Girls. I like George Michael (and not just Everything She Wants either). I once walked into Tower on Sunset Boulevard, heard Vanessa' Carlton's A Thousand Miles playing, thought it sounded catchy and went up to the cashier to ask him what it was. With a look of faint incredulity, he pointed to the Billboard chart, where it sat at number one, a place it had occupied for God knows how many weeks. All of which is a way of forestalling the possibility that anyone might mistake me for some kind of expert when it comes to music or this list as having any pretensions towards definitiveness. Its just a list of the songs I listened to the most, fell in love with the most, and think I will be listening to for a long time to come.

R.I.P. Dan O' Bannon, Alien screenwriter (reputedly)

“Alien is to Star Wars what the Rolling Stones were to the Beatles,” said producer David Giler, “Its a nasty Star Wars.” Produced by the same studio, Fox, still under the management of Alan Ladd, the Alien script had been sitting on the desk as Fox for almost a year without a flutter of interest, according to screenwriter Dan O’ Bannon: “They wanted to follow through on Star Wars, and they wanted to follow through fast and the only spaceship script they had sitting on their desk was Alien, so they greenlighted it, wham.” It almost certainly couldn’t have been the quality of O’Bannon’s script. A hardcore sci-fi nut and neophyte screenwriter, fresh from USC, O’ Bannon had written something called Starbeast, and it came crammed with clichés from sci-fi movies of the fifties like Forbidden Planet and It! Terror From Beyond Space. There were pyramids, and holograms, and an all-male cast, who spoke at length about “what should be done” in stiff, officer-class locutions, but never got around to doing very much: —

STANDARD steps forward and slaps ROBY across the face.

The others are shocked.

HUNTER: Hey now, what is this?

STANDARD: Ask him.

ROBY: I understood why you did that.

STANDARD: Good...

After a hard stare at Roby, Standard give him a curt nod and

turns his attention to the machinery.

It read like The Last Days of the British Raj in space — all curt nods,

hard stares and stiff upper lips. “It had not even B-picture merit,”

said producer Walter Hill. “Nobody could take it seriously. It had

a ‘Jesus gadzooks’ quality about it”. Hill had just set up a production

company, Brandywine films, with his partner David Giler, and landed

a production deal at Fox, when a friend passed them O Bannon’s

script, and while they both hated it, they admired what Hill called

the “low cunning” of its set-up — “you had a monster that could not

be killed without destroying your own life-support system”. Giler

sensed that the key to the film would be to treat it like an A-movie,

with full production values, and so he and Hill sat down and rewrote

the script in just under three days. Hill was the writer / director

behind such films as The Warriors and The Driver, and he wrote

scenes that played out like a one-liner competition at a tough-guy

convention. “Character is action,” he once said. “In my films, when

somebody puts a gun in your face, character is how many times you

blink.” He dropped the pyramids, introduced a computer called

mother, made two of the characters women, introduced a note of

discord between the officers and the working class crew, and

streamlined the whole thing with his headlong, hard-boiled style

— somewhere between “staccato and blank verse”, said Giler,

and it went something like this:—

A red stain.
Then a smear of blood blossoms on his chest.
The fabric of his tunic is ripped open.
A small head the size of a man’s fist pushes out.
The tiny head lunges forward, comes spurting out
of Dallas’s chest trailing a thick body.
Spatters fluids and blood in its wake.
Lands in the middle of the dishes and food.
Wriggles away while the crew scatters.
Halloween Haiku. It is to Hill, then,  that we owe much of Alien.

From Blockbuster: How Hollywood Learned To Stop Worrying And
Love The Summer by Yours Truly